Cooney, J P; Oloke, D and Gyoh, L (2023) A novel heritage BIM (HBIM) framework development for heritage buildings refurbishment based on an investigative study of microorganisms. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 21(4), pp. 1046-1082. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: This study aims to demonstrate the possibility of showing the functionality of complex microbial groups, within ancient structures within a process of refurbishment on a heritage building information modelling (BIM) platform. Design/methodology/approach: Both a qualitative and qualitative research method will be used throughout, as observational and scientific results will be obtained and collated. This path being; phenomena – acquisition tools – storage – analysis tools – literature. Using this methodology, one pilot study within the scope of demolition and refurbishment, using suitable methods of collecting and managing data (structural or otherwise), will be used and generated by various software and applications. The principle methods used for the identification of such micro-organisms will incorporate a polymerase chain reaction method (PCR), to amplify DNA and to identify any or all spores present. The BIM/historical BIM (HBIM) process will be used to create a remotely-based survey to obtain and collate data using a laser scanner to produce a three-dimensional point cloud model to evaluate and deduce the condition, make-up and stature of the monument. A documentation management system will be devised to enable the development of plain language questions and an exchange information requirement, to identify such documentation required to enable safe refurbishment and to give health and safety guidance. Four data sampling extractions will be conducted, two for each site, within the research, for each of the periods being assessed, that being the Norman and Tudor areas of the monument. Findings: From laboratory PCR analysis, results show a conclusive presence of micro-organism groups and will be represented within a hierarchical classification, from kingdom to species. Originality/value: The BIM/HBIM process will highlight results in a graphical form to show data collected, particularly within the PCR application. It will also create standardisation and availability for such data from ancient monuments to make available all data stored, as such analysis becomes substantially important to enable the production of data sets for comparison, from within the framework of this research.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | BIM; eir; hbim; health and safety; heritage; metagenomics; micro-organisms; plq; polymerase chain reaction; refurbishment |
| Index terms: | platform, acquisition, information modelling, framework development, monument, presence, sampling, standardization, health and safety, management system, laboratory, survey, documentation, point cloud, qualitative research method, functionality, heritage building, methodology |
| Subjects: | digital design, professional development, health safety and environment, research methods, performance measurement, architectural elements, management, research management, research design and methodology, business, construction type, data collection methods, contractual arrangements, environmental science, design features |
| Topics: | Organizational Design, Quality Management, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Sustainability, Construction Technology, Procurement, Information Management, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here