Non-reactive test rig for combustor-turbine interaction studies in industrial gas turbines

Fiorineschi, L; Bacci, T; Frillici, F S S; Cubeda, S; Volpe, Y; Rotini, F; Carfagni, M and Facchini, B (2023) Non-reactive test rig for combustor-turbine interaction studies in industrial gas turbines. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 21(3), pp. 758-777. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: This paper aims to present the design of a particular non-reactive test rig for combustion swirlers and first stage turbine nozzles. The test rig is required for important experimental activities aimed at the optimization of a specific class of gas turbines. Design/methodology/approach: A multi-disciplinary team performed the design process by following a tailored design approach, which has been developed for the specific case. The design outcomes allowed to build a fully functional test rig to be introduced in a test cell and then to perform preliminary experiments about the fluid dynamic behaviour of the turbine elements. Findings: The followed design approach allowed to efficiently perform the task, by supporting the information exchange among the different subjects involved in both the conceptual and the embodiment design of the test rig. Additionally, the performed experiments allowed to achieve a final configuration that makes the test rig a valuable test case for combustor-turbine interaction studies. Research limitations/implications: The study described in this paper is focused on the design of a specific test rig, used for first validation tests. However, the achieved results (both in terms of design and test) constitutes the underpinning of the in-depth investigations to be performed in the next steps of the experimental campaign. Originality/value: To the best of the authors' knowledge, the present paper is the first one that comprehensively describes the design activity of an experimental test rig for turbine application, also providing indications about the specific methodological procedure used to manage the process.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: embodiment design; fluid engineering; fluid modelling; mechanical design; systematic design; test rig design
Index terms: investigation, test case, interaction, modelling, methodology, configuration, validation, design process, information exchange, experiment
Subjects: research methods, professional development, behavioral psychology, systems engineering, data collection methods, design methods, professional practice, data science, analytical methods
Topics: Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Digital Applications, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here