Lawal, Y S; Ibrahim, A M; Abubakar, M; Ishaq, Z H and Sa'ad, M M (2023) A simulation-based binomial model for building development appraisal. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 21(1), pp. 75-107. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: Building developments are often capital intensive, have a long payback period and many associated risks and uncertainties. This makes investments in building projects to be a big challenge. This study aims to develop a computerized simulation-based binomial model (CSBBM) for building investment appraisal with a view to improving the economic sustainability of proposed building projects. Design/methodology/approach: Mathematical equations and algorithms were developed based on the binomial method (BM) of real options analysis and then implemented on a computer system. A hybrid algorithm that integrates Monte Carlo simulation (MCS) and BM was also developed. A real-life project was used to test the model. Sensitivity analysis was also conducted to explore the influence of input variables on development option value (DOV). Findings: The test result shows that the model developed provides a better estimate of the value of an investment when compared with traditional net present value technique, which underestimate the value. Moreover, inflation rate (i) and rental value (Ri) are the most sensitive variables for DOV. An increase in i and Ri by just 5% causes a corresponding increase in DOV by 202% and 132%, respectively. While the least sensitive variable is the discount rate (r), as an increase in r by 5% causes a corresponding decrease in DOV by just 9%. The CSBBM is capable of determining the optimal time of development of buildings with an accuracy of 80.77%. Practical implications: The hybrid model produces higher DOV than that of only the BM because MCS considers randomness in uncontrollable variables. Thus, building investment decision-makers should always use MCS to complement the BM in an investment analysis. Originality/value: There is limited evidence on the use of this kind of hybrid model for determining DOV in practice.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | binomial method; building investment; construction management; development option; Monte Carlo simulation; sustainable construction |
| Index terms: | building investment, development appraisal, net present value, Monte Carlo simulation, investment analysis, economic sustainability, option, estimate, real options analysis, sustainable construction, sensitivity analysis, computer system, accuracy, evidence, payback, inflation, methodology, appraisal |
| Subjects: | professional development, sustainable construction, factor and component analysis, research methods, environmental hazards, financial analysis, asset management, decision analysis, computing systems, value management, evaluation and assessment methods, financial and cost management, design economy, economic analysis, modelling and simulation |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Design Practice, Risk Management, Sustainability, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here