Providing project management knowledge and skills through scaffolding and project-based learning strategy

Pokharel, S (2023) Providing project management knowledge and skills through scaffolding and project-based learning strategy. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 21(4), pp. 1153-1172. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: Project management skills are important for today’s engineers, as they get involved in various project-based employment roles. The purpose of this paper is to discuss a learning model to provide project management knowledge through scaffolding and project-based learning (PjBL) methods in the project engineering course. Design/methodology/approach: This paper discusses a generic learning model that includes how scaffolding and project-based methods are integrated to provide project management skills to the students. The paper uses the survey method to collect and analyze data on the applicability of the model. Findings: Statistical analysis of the collected data shows that the respondents positively perceive the value of the learning model to gain project management knowledge and skills. The response shows that the model is useful not only to the current students but also the graduates who use project management skills in their employment. Practical implications: The learning model can be used by the instructors to provide project management skills to undergraduate and graduate students from all education disciplines. Originality/value: This paper focuses on the development of a unique learning model, and artifacts used by the students and the instructors for interactive learning and gaining skills on project management.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: engineering students; learning model; project management; project-based learning; scaffolding
Index terms: project engineering, undergraduate, project-based learning, project management, employment, engineer, statistical analysis, methodology, graduate student, instructor, artifact, strategy, scaffolding, survey
Subjects: sociology, project management theory and practice, research methods, management, curriculum development, data science, operations management, curriculum design, practitioner, control systems, learning methods, profession, data collection methods
Topics: Human Resources, Education, Site Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here