Practitioners' perceptions of the potential impact of industry 4.0 on construction health and safety

Smallwood, J and Allen, C (2023) Practitioners' perceptions of the potential impact of industry 4.0 on construction health and safety. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 21(2), pp. 486-501. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: Historically, a range of health and safety (H&S) challenges continue to be experienced. A two-day construction Industry 4.0 oriented H&S summit presented an opportunity to survey the delegates. The purpose of the study was to determine their perceptions, whether the presentations had an impact on their understanding and appreciation of the H&S challenges and the potential of Industry 4.0 technologies to improve H&S. Design/methodology/approach: This paper reports on the findings emanating from a quantitative study that entailed the completion of a self-administered questionnaire survey conducted among delegates at the inception and closure of a two-day construction H&S summit. Findings: The findings indicate that a range of H&S challenges are experienced in construction, Industry 4.0 technologies can contribute to addressing the H&S challenges and the presentations had an impact on their understanding and appreciation of the H&S challenges. Research limitations/implications: The findings are primarily based upon perceptions in terms of the potential of Industry 4.0 technologies to contribute to addressing the H&S challenges. Originality/value: This study reports on findings from one of a limited number of Industry 4.0 studies conducted in construction in South Africa. The findings indicate the level of awareness with respect to Industry 4.0 and the likelihood of the implementation of such technologies, as initially practitioners are likely to act based upon perceptions.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: construction; health and safety; industry 4.0; performance
Index terms: implementation, construction industry 4.0, industry 4.0, South Africa, practitioner, questionnaire, methodology, survey, health and safety
Subjects: technology adoption, contractual arrangements, digital engineering, data collection methods, practitioner, research methods, Geography, health safety and environment
Topics: Research Practice, Geographical Context, Health and Safety, Procurement, Roles and Professions, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here