Digital transformation in the construction industry: A bibliometric review

Adekunle, S A; Aigbavboa, C O; Ejohwomu, O; Adekunle, E A and Thwala, W D (2024) Digital transformation in the construction industry: A bibliometric review. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 22(1), pp. 130-158. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: The construction industry has been traditionally referred to as slow when it comes to technological transformation. This study aims to investigate and present a scorecard of the construction industry in the past decade, the paper adopted Bibliometrics. The study identified the various digital transformation (DT) aspects in the construction industry and future research directions are also identified. Design/methodology/approach: To achieve the aim of this research, an inductive approach was adopted through a grounded theory strategy. Secondary data was retrieved from the Scopus database and analysed using Biblioshiny and VOSviewer. The data was retrieved through specific keywords related to the study focus. Findings: The study also proposed a balanced flow model for DT discussion in the construction industry. DT in the construction industry disrupts every aspect of the industry, albeit at different rates due to the existing barriers; hence, the study identified areas that require further research. It, thus, provides a theoretical and practical basis for researchers and practitioners alike. Originality/value: The study reviewed the DT research discuss in the construction industry. It is worthy of note that this is the first study that analyses the DT of the construction industry in the past decade.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: 4ir; bibliometric; construction industry; construction innovation; digital transformation; industry 4.0; literature review; scientometrics; technological revolution
Index terms: construction innovation, practitioner, scorecard, bibliometrics, methodology, inductive approach, literature review, strategy, scientometrics, construction industry, transformation, database, secondary data, grounded theory, industry 4.0
Subjects: business, data collection methods, practitioner, technology adoption, data analysis and analytics, research methods, theoretical framing, management, performance measurement, building construction, data management, research evaluation and metrics, industry analysis
Topics: Roles and Professions, Information Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Quality Management, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here