Kamath, M V; Prashanth, S; Kumar, M and Tantri, A (2024) Machine-learning-algorithm to predict the high-performance concrete compressive strength using multiple data. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 22(2), pp. 532-560. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: The compressive strength of concrete depends on many interdependent parameters; its exact prediction is not that simple because of complex processes involved in strength development. This study aims to predict the compressive strength of normal concrete and high-performance concrete using four datasets. Design/methodology/approach: In this paper, five established individual Machine Learning (ML) regression models have been compared: Decision Regression Tree, Random Forest Regression, Lasso Regression, Ridge Regression and Multiple-Linear regression. Four datasets were studied, two of which are previous research datasets, and two datasets are from the sophisticated lab using five established individual ML regression models. Findings: The five statistical indicators like coefficient of determination (R2), mean absolute error, root mean squared error, Nash–Sutcliffe efficiency and mean absolute percentage error have been used to compare the performance of the models. The models are further compared using statistical indicators with previous studies. Lastly, to understand the variable effect of the predictor, the sensitivity and parametric analysis were carried out to find the performance of the variable. Originality/value: The findings of this paper will allow readers to understand the factors involved in identifying the machine learning models and concrete datasets. In so doing, we hope that this research advances the toolset needed to predict compressive strength.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | decision regression tree; linear regression; random forest regression; ridge regression |
| Index terms: | forest, compressive strength, methodology, machine learning, dataset, efficiency, regression model, parametric analysis, high-performance concrete |
| Subjects: | statistical analysis, data management, material analysis and testing, research methods, performance management, artificial intelligence, environmental science, data analysis and analytics, materials science |
| Topics: | Quality Management, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here