Khalid, K; Khalid, K and Davidson, R (2024) A multi-group assessment of safety culture among engineering students in the United Arab Emirates. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 22(2), pp. 501-515. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to identify the factor structure of safety culture construct among engineering students at university context and to examine the measurement invariance of this instrument across different socio-demographic groups in a sample of engineering students in the United Arab Emirates (UAE). Design/methodology/approach: An exploratory online questionnaire was completed by 770 undergraduate and postgraduate engineering students across the UAE. Data were analyzed using a diversified multi-group and a robust and sophisticated cross-validation testing strategy. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was used to test factor structures identified in previous studies. Multi-group invariance testing was conducted to determine the extent to which factor structure is comparable across groups (i.e. gender, educational and experiential background). Findings: Three-factor model was preferred for its parsimony. The results showed that the level of safety awareness and attitude is relatively satisfactory, whereas safety behaviour is inadequate. No significant difference was showed in multi-group invariance between demographic groups. Research limitations/implications: This research is a cross-sectional study and limited to the views of engineering students (informal group). The study would benefit from both informal and formal groups in assessing safety culture at university for a robust empirical evidence. The research highlights relevant implications for policy and program development, by pointing to the need to promote safety culture and mitigate safety-related accidents among engineering students. Originality/value: This paper offers insight into benefit of understanding the level of safety culture among engineering students and extend knowledge of informal group involvement in safety-related accidents at university level.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | engineering students; safety attitude; safety awareness; safety behavior; safety culture |
| Index terms: | undergraduate, testing, safety attitude, safety culture, safety behaviour, validation, questionnaire, evidence, postgraduate, methodology, program, United Arab Emirates, confirmatory factor analysis, strategy |
| Subjects: | data collection methods, evaluation and assessment methods, professional practice, curriculum development, management, software systems, research methods, health safety and environment, Geography, professional development, occupational health and safety management, higher education, statistical analysis |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Information Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety, Business Strategy, Education, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here