Factors impeding the implementation of buildability assessment in building construction industry

Osuizugbo, I C (2024) Factors impeding the implementation of buildability assessment in building construction industry. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 22(6), pp. 1825-1846. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: Buildability assessment is an important tool used in improving buildability of building designs. Its practice has positive impact on construction project such as cost-saving, material waste reduction, labour-saving technologies, increase in efficiency, saving wasteful efforts and quality improvement as well as cost-effective methods of site construction and future maintenance. However, there are several factors hindering building construction industry to implement buildability assessment. In addition, there are few studies that described the factors impeding the implementation of buildability assessment in construction industry. This study aims to determine the factors impeding buildability assessment implementation in the Nigerian building construction industry Design/methodology/approach: Quantitative research method was adopted for the study. Questionnaires were administered to purposively selected group of architects, engineers, builders and quantity surveyors. A total of 368 questionnaires were distributed among the sampled participants, out of which a total of 219 representing 60% were sufficiently filled and returned. Data elicited were analysed using inferential and descriptive statistics. Findings: The results revealed that “poor co-ordination amongst different design disciplines”, “lack of buildability assessment awareness”, “design review pattern where construction personnel (builders) are invited to assess the building production information”, “unwillingness to invest extra money and effort during the early stage of project” and “designers value aesthetics and functionalities more than buildability in their designs” are the topmost five factors impeding buildability assessment implementation in the Nigerian construction industry. Originality/value: This study highlights factors impeding the implementation of buildability assessment in construction industry. An understanding of these factors can help stakeholders in the construction industry facilitate the development of strategies required to mitigate the factors impeding buildability assessment implementation in the sector. © 2022, Emerald Publishing Limited.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: buildability assessment; building construction industry; impeding; implementation; Nigeria
Index terms: architect, implementation, construction industry, statistics, quantitative research, efficiency, quantity surveying, building design, quality improvement, designer, Nigeria, engineer, aesthetic, questionnaire, methodology, construction project, waste reduction, buildability, builder, building construction, strategy, construction personnel, functionality
Subjects: building construction, industry analysis, design efficiency, performance management, research methods, factor and component analysis, sustainability assessment, management, Geography, production management, design features, architectural design, project delivery, data analysis and analytics, contractual arrangements, mathematical modelling, profession, workforce, data collection methods, practitioner
Topics: Business Strategy, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Construction Technology, Procurement, Sustainability, Design Practice, Quality Management, Human Resources
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here