Othman, A A E and El-Saeidy, Y A (2024) Early supplier involvement framework for reducing construction waste during the design process. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 22(2), pp. 578-597. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: The purpose of this paper is to develop a framework to facilitate early supplier involvement (ESI) as an approach for reducing construction waste (CW) generated during the design process. Design/methodology/approach: A research methodology consists of literature review, case studies and survey questionnaire was designed to achieve the abovementioned aim. First, the literature review was used to investigate CW, CW generated during the design process, the design process and ESI. Second, two construction projects were analysed to investigate the role of ESI towards reducing CW generated during the design waste. Third, a survey questionnaire was carried out with a representative sample of architectural design firms (ADFs) in Egypt to examine their perception and application of ESI towards reducing CW generated during the design process. Based on the results of the above, the research developed a framework to facilitate ESI during the design process to reduce CW. Findings: Through literature review, the research highlighted the causes of CW generated during the design process and identified the benefits and challenges that encounter ESI in ADFs. Results of data analysis showed that “last-minute changes due to client requirements” was ranked the highest challenges of ESI in ADFs in Egypt followed by “lack of design experience”. Moreover, “providing technical information about materials and equipment and their capabilities” was ranked by respondents as the highest contributions of suppliers during the design process which leads to waste reduction followed by “better estimation of materials and costs”. Finally, respondents stated that “resistance of ADFs to include suppliers in the design phase” was ranked the highest challenge of ESI in the design process followed by “no clear guidelines or policies that organise ESI”. Research limitations/implications: Because of the conceptual nature of the proposed framework, it has to be tested and validated to ensure its capability to overcome the challenges of ESI as an approach for reducing CW generated during the design process. Practical implications: This research presents a practical solution to the problem of CW generated during the design process through ESI. Originality/value: The research discussed the causes of CW originated from the design process and the benefits and challenges of ESI in ADFs. It investigated the perception and application of ESI in ADFs in Egypt. The proposed framework which was designed to facilitate the integration of suppliers in the early stages of the project life cycle represents a synthesis that is novel and creative in thought and adds value to the knowledge in a manner that has not previously occurred.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | construction waste reduction; early supplier involvement; Egypt; framework; the construction industry; the design process |
| Index terms: | case study, estimation, life cycle, client requirements, design phase, research methodology, technical information, construction waste, construction industry, Egypt, design process, construction waste reduction, data analysis, survey, literature review, questionnaire, integration, methodology, construction project, architectural design, waste reduction |
| Subjects: | organizational analysis, industry analysis, design practice, sustainability assessment, research methods, production management, Geography, technology management, professional development, professional practice, data analysis and analytics, financial and cost management, data collection methods, research design and methodology, waste management, value management, design methods |
| Topics: | Sustainability, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Project Management, Information Management, Cost Management, Organizational Design, Design Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here