A framework for enhancing building maintainability through facilitating early suppliers' involvement in the design process

Othman, A A E and Kamal, A R (2024) A framework for enhancing building maintainability through facilitating early suppliers' involvement in the design process. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 22(4), pp. 1231-1256. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: The aim of this paper is to develop a framework to enhance building maintainability through facilitating early suppliers' involvement (ESI) in the design process. Design/methodology/approach: A research methodology consisting of literature review, case studies and survey questionnaire was designed to achieve the above-mentioned aim. Firstly, literature review was used to examine the concepts of building maintenance, maintainability, the design process and ESI. Secondly, three case studies were presented and analysed to investigate the role of ESI towards enhancing building maintainability during the design process. Thirdly, a survey questionnaire was carried out with a representative sample of architectural design firms (ADFs) in Egypt to investigate their perception and application of ESI towards enhancing building maintainability during the design process. Finally, the research developed a framework to facilitate ESI in the design process in ADFs in Egypt. Findings: Through literature review, the research highlighted the relationship between ESI and enhancing building maintainability and identified the roles, benefits, challenges and that encounter ESI in ADFs, factors for suppliers selection and levels of involvement. Results of the data analysis showed that “Difficulty of trusting external parties and sharing information with transparency” was ranked the highest challenge of ESI in ADFs in Egypt, followed by “Legal competitive advantage restrictions”. Moreover, “Better estimation for operation and maintenance costs” was ranked the highest contributions of ESI towards enhancing building maintainability, followed by “Reduce the number of operation and maintenance problems or reworks”. Finally, respondents stated that “Innovation, technical expertise, and competence” was ranked the highest supplier’s selection criteria, while “paying consultation fees for offering advice and recommendations to the design team” was ranked the highest form of supplier’s remuneration. Research limitations/implications: The proposed framework contributes to the body of knowledge through proposing five functions that aimed to facilitate ESI in the design process, a research area that received scant attention in construction research. In addition, because of the conceptual nature of the framework, it has to be validated to ensure its capability to overcome the challenges of ESI as an approach for enhancing building maintainability during the design process. Practical implications: This research presents a practical solution that bridges the gap between theory and practice through overcoming the challenges that obstruct suppliers from being involved in the design process as an approach for enhancing building maintainability. Originality/value: This research discussed the relationship between ESI and enhancing building maintainability as well as the roles, benefits and challenges that encounter ESI in ADFs. In addition, the research investigated the levels of suppliers' involvement, selection criteria and forms of payment. Moreover, it investigated the perception and application of ESI in ADFs in Egypt towards improving building maintainability. The research proposed a framework to facilitate the integration of suppliers in the early stages of the project life cycle. It represents a synthesis that is novel and creative in thought and adds value to the knowledge in a manner that has not previously occurred.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: design for maintainability; early supplier involvement; Egypt; framework; maintainability; maintenance; the design process
Index terms: transparency, selection criteria, Egypt, research methodology, estimation, design for maintainability, life cycle, case study, competitive advantage, architectural design, body of knowledge, questionnaire, integration, methodology, competence, survey, rework, design team, literature review, design process, maintainability, operation and maintenance, data analysis, building maintenance
Subjects: market analysis, organizational analysis, tendering, maintenance engineering, research methods, design practice, personnel development, professional development, Geography, operations management, financial and cost management, data analysis and analytics, knowledge management, professional practice, research design and methodology, construction type, data collection methods, design methods, value management
Topics: Construction Technology, Procurement, Information Management, Research Practice, Project Management, Geographical Context, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Organizational Design, Human Resources, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here