Palsodkar, M; Yadav, G and Nagare, M R (2024) Integrating industry 4.0 and agile new product development practices to evaluate the penetration of sustainable development goals in manufacturing industries. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 22(4), pp. 1351-1392. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: The United Nations member countries adopted a set of 17 sustainable development goals (SDGs) to achieve a better and more sustainable future for all. It encourages the use of sustainable practices during new product development (NPD). Competitiveness has put pressure on organizations to maintain their market share and look for new approaches related to NPD. The current study aims to focus on creating a framework that can help to achieve the SDGs by adopting agile new product development (ANPD) practices and Industry 4.0 technologies. Design/methodology/approach: From the literature, various ANPD practices, Industry 4.0 technologies, performance metrics, their interconnection and their contribution toward achieving SDGs are extracted. The weights of selected Industry 4.0–ANPD practices are computed by robust best worst method (RBWM), and the Fuzzy-VIKOR method is used to rank the selected performance metrics. To test the robustness of the developed framework, sensitivity analysis is also performed. Findings: The results show that among the various Industry 4.0–ANPD practices “Multi-skilled employees” have the highest weight followed by “Customer requirement analysis and prioritization.” Whereas for performance metrics, “The number of innovative products launched per year” is ranked first, with the “Average time between two launches” at second place. Practical implications: This research contributes to the adoption of ANPD practices and Industry 4.0 technologies for the achievement of the business SDGs. The shortlisted Industry 4.0–ANPD practices will help in resolving the social and environmental issues. The set of performance metrics will help practitioners and managers to evaluate the performance of ANPD in the context of business SDGs. Originality/value: This study adds to the understanding related to Industry 4.0–ANPD practices adoption. And to the best of the authors' knowledge, it is believed that no similar work has been done previously and by using industry insights into technology components, this work contributes to valuable insights into the subject.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | agile new product development; fuzzy vikor; industry 4.0; robust best worst method; sustainability; sustainable development goals |
| Index terms: | performance metric, environmental issue, manager, sensitivity analysis, manufacturing industry, methodology, practitioner, market share, industry 4.0, fuzzy logic, sustainable practice, United Nations, sustainable development goal, competitiveness, new product development, penetration |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, environmental hazards, market analysis, sustainable practices, sustainable design, performance measurement, research methods, technology adoption, data science, institutional frameworks, environmental issues, practitioner, innovation studies |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Quality Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Governance, Sustainability |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here