Phan, P T C and Zhou, Z (2024) Implementation of design for construction safety (DfS) in the Vietnam context: awareness, attitude and practices. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 22(6), pp. 1958-1979. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: This paper aims to inquire into the awareness of Vietnamese architects about design for safety (DfS) and the level of engagement in applying DfS among them to get a generic view of the implementation of DfS in Vietnam. Design/methodology/approach: Quantitative research was used, in which a questionnaire was sent to Vietnamese architects to evaluate how they consider and apply DfS in the design process. Inferential and descriptive statistics then analysed the obtained data to identify the role of each factor. Findings: The results from the survey conclude that Vietnamese architects have low engagement in applying DfS despite their high awareness and positive attitude towards DfS. Besides, the participants showed the need for further DfS education and training, which is lacking in Vietnamese formal education. In addition, the research also confirms that DfS education and training have positive impacts on the frequency of DfS implementation in Vietnam. Research limitations/implications: This research contributes to the knowledge of DfS implementation in developing countries. In line with this, further studies on the DfS concept in developing countries are needed to draw a more objective overview and give the solution for the low DfS appliance. Originality/value: To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this is the first study inquiring into the implication of DfS in Vietnam, contributing to improving the lack of knowledge in this field in developing countries and Vietnam in particular. © 2023, Emerald Publishing Limited.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | architects; construction health and safety; construction in developing countries; design for safety; developing country; Vietnam |
| Index terms: | architect, statistics, implementation, education and training, quantitative research, design for safety, methodology, questionnaire, construction safety, developing country, Vietnam, design process, health and safety, survey |
| Subjects: | contractual arrangements, data analysis and analytics, mathematical modelling, profession, data collection methods, design methods, professional education, environmental health, research methods, development economics, Geography, health safety and environment |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Procurement, Sustainability, Health and Safety, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Education, Design Practice, International Construction |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here