Secured platform for healthcare data: Privacy preservation based blockchain environment

Raghav, N and Bhola, A K (2024) Secured platform for healthcare data: Privacy preservation based blockchain environment. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 22(2), pp. 365-384. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: To make more smart health-care system, the health-care data should be shared in the secure manner, and it improves health-care service quality. This paper aims to implement a modern decentralized blockchain, safe and easy-to-use health-care technology application in the cloud. Findings: On observing the graph, the convergence analysis of proposed Levy Flight-integrated moth flame optimization method at 80th iteration was 4.59%, 2.80%, 3.316%, 8.92% and 2.55% higher than the traditional models MFO, artificial bee colony (ABC), particle swarm optimization (PSO), moth search algorithm (MSA) and glow worm swarm optimization (GWSO), respectively, for Hungarian data set. Particularly, in best case scenario, the adopted method attains low cost value (5.672671) when compared to all other traditional models such as MFO (5.727314), ABC (5.711577), PSO (5.706499), MSA (5.764517) and GWSO (5.723353). Originality/value: The proposed method achieved effective performance in terms of key sensitivity, sanitization effectiveness, restoration effectiveness, etc.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: block chain technology; data restoration; data sanitization; optimization; privacy preservation
Index terms: service quality, privacy, restoration, low cost, platform, effectiveness, blockchain
Subjects: professional ethics, bidding, computing systems, renovation and retrofit, performance measurement, digital design, performance management
Topics: Engineering Principles, Procurement, Digital Applications, Legal Issues, Quality Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here