Effect of traffic data set on various machine-learning algorithms when forecasting air quality

Sulaimon, I A; Alaka, H; Olu-Ajayi, R; Ahmad, M; Ajayi, S and Hye, A (2024) Effect of traffic data set on various machine-learning algorithms when forecasting air quality. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 22(3), pp. 1030-1056. ISSN 1726-0531

Abstract

Purpose: Road traffic emissions are generally believed to contribute immensely to air pollution, but the effect of road traffic data sets on air quality (AQ) predictions has not been fully investigated. This paper aims to investigate the effects traffic data set have on the performance of machine learning (ML) predictive models in AQ prediction. Design/methodology/approach: To achieve this, the authors have set up an experiment with the control data set having only the AQ data set and meteorological (Met) data set, while the experimental data set is made up of the AQ data set, Met data set and traffic data set. Several ML models (such as extra trees regressor, eXtreme gradient boosting regressor, random forest regressor, K-neighbors regressor and two others) were trained, tested and compared on these individual combinations of data sets to predict the volume of PM2.5, PM10, NO2 and O3 in the atmosphere at various times of the day. Findings: The result obtained showed that various ML algorithms react differently to the traffic data set despite generally contributing to the performance improvement of all the ML algorithms considered in this study by at least 20% and an error reduction of at least 18.97%. Research limitations/implications: This research is limited in terms of the study area, and the result cannot be generalized outside of the UK as some of the inherent conditions may not be similar elsewhere. Additionally, only the ML algorithms commonly used in literature are considered in this research, therefore, leaving out a few other ML algorithms. Practical implications: This study reinforces the belief that the traffic data set has a significant effect on improving the performance of air pollution ML prediction models. Hence, there is an indication that ML algorithms behave differently when trained with a form of traffic data set in the development of an AQ prediction model. This implies that developers and researchers in AQ prediction need to identify the ML algorithms that behave in their best interest before implementation. Originality/value: The result of this study will enable researchers to focus more on algorithms of benefit when using traffic data sets in AQ prediction.

Item Type: Article
Uncontrolled Keywords: air-quality prediction; big-data; machine learning; traffic data set
Index terms: forecasting, performance improvement, air quality, implementation, forest, air pollution, learning algorithm, prediction model, experiment, methodology, machine learning
Subjects: research methods, algorithms, performance measurement, prediction and forecasting, contractual arrangements, environmental science, artificial intelligence, climate science, data collection methods
Topics: Quality Management, Digital Applications, Sustainability, Procurement, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here