Zulu, E; Zulu, S L; Chabala, M; Kavishe, N; Chifunda, C and Musonda, I (2024) Infrastructure design stage considerations for environmental sustainability in Zambia. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 22(3), pp. 836-853. ISSN 1726-0531
Abstract
Purpose: While previous studies have highlighted the importance of incorporating environmental sustainability in building designs, there is a paucity of studies that assess the extent to which design teams in developing countries consider environmental sustainability at the building design stage. Therefore, using Zambia as a case study, this study examined the extent to which infrastructure design teams in a developing country consider environmental sustainability at the design stage. Design/methodology/approach: The study used a qualitative research approach using structured interviews because there are hardly any studies which have explored the extent to which designers incorporate environmental sustainability in infrastructure designs in developing countries. The data is analysed thematically using the ATLAS.ti software. Findings: The results show that environmental sustainability is not an important design consideration because it is secondary to functional, technical and aesthetic considerations. Environmental considerations are also made in an ad hoc manner and when it is cost-effective for the project. Regulatory requirements pertaining to environmental protection are adhered to without any cost considerations. It was, therefore, theorised that building design teams in developing countries make technical, functional and aesthetic consideration during the infrastructure design stage ahead of environmental considerations. Originality/value: There is a paucity of studies that have investigated whether building infrastructure designers consider issues of environmental sustainability at the design stage in developing countries. The findings have practical implications on how developing countries can foster environmental sustainability at the design stage and avoid generating a building infrastructure stock that will require environmental resilience adaptation in the future.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | building sustainability challenges; design considerations; design stage; environmental sustainability; sustainable building design |
| Index terms: | environmental protection, environmental resilience, developing country, interview, design team, design stage, methodology, qualitative research, sustainable building design, environmental sustainability, case study, building design, Zambia, designer, adaptation, aesthetic, building sustainability |
| Subjects: | environmental engineering, development economics, health safety and environment, Geography, research methods, factor and component analysis, architectural design, professional practice, energy systems, sustainability and energy, climate science, user focus, research design and methodology, data collection methods, profession |
| Topics: | International Construction, Design Practice, Sustainability, Roles and Professions, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Health and Safety |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here