Paulson, B C and Fondahl, J W (1983) Craft jurisdiction impact on construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 109(4), pp. 369-386. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Construction craft jurisdiction, normally exercised by unions, includes both territorial and technological claims to certain categories of work. Jurisdiction is important to unions in maintaining membership, negotiating wages and benefits, defining apprenticeship programs, and establishing work rules. This paper reports on a research project that had three main objectives: (1) Collect and analyze statistics on the incidence of jurisdictional disputes; (2) evaluate existing jurisdictional dispute settlement mechanisms; and (3) survey contractors and owners to determine the impact of craft jurisdictional practices (not only disputes) on costs and schedules. The paper concludes that there is inadequate statistical information at present to support informed decision-making on jurisdictional problems. Most dispute settlement mechanisms are antiquated and ineffective, but there are good plans in some local areas. The survey revealed that there are serious cost and schedule impacts on construction projects from observing craft jurisdictional practices.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | apprenticeship, decision-making, construction project, program, negotiating, survey, jurisdiction, wages, statistics, owner, dispute |
| Subjects: | software systems, production management, conflict resolution, business economics, professional education, decision analysis, sociology, data collection methods, mathematical modelling, dispute resolution, legal systems |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Project Management, Risk Management, Stakeholder Management, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Legal Issues, Education |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here