Thomas, H R and Daily, J (1983) Crew performance measurement via activity sampling. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 109(3), pp. 309-320. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Three methods of measuring the performance of construction crews are described and compared. These are: (1) Work sampling; (2) group timing technique; and (3) five-minute rating. By gathering data from a time-lapse film, the three methods can be compared for the same operation. Work sampling is shown to provide important information about the characteristics of delays. Considerable time is lost because of waiting for materials and for instructions. The group timing technique provides production data that is very different from work sampling. It is suggested that this technique can be used to validate estimating data regarding cycle times. It is also shown how a crew balance index can be determined which will allow the manager to evaluate if the crew size is appropriate for the way the work is being performed. The five-minute rating is shown to be a quick estimator of the delay time of a crew. It is shown that the reliability of the five-minute rating is not as good as that of work sampling of group timing technique. Various parameters are calculated throughout, and it is suggested that over a period of time, these can be used to monitor crew performance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | estimating, estimator, manager, sampling, crew performance |
| Subjects: | profession, management, data collection methods, practitioner, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Cost Management, Site Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here