Planning and organization of research in building

Warszawski, A (1983) Planning and organization of research in building. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 109(3), pp. 261-275. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Identification of research needs in the building sector, and efficient organization of an institutional research effort for their fulfillment, is analyzed. First, the objectives of research in building are enumerated as: (1) Defining standards of performance and methods of measurement of their attainment; (2) exploring methods for attainment of standards at maximum efficiency; and (3) exploring the possibilities for improving performance of systems and compounds. Then the nature of the research process necessary to attain these objectives is explored. Later, methods for identification of research needs are considered, and criteria for determining their priority are suggested. Possible research contribution as identified in the Israeli building sector was divided, in this context, into the following subjects: (1) Generation of basic data; (2) preparation of infrastructure for codes and specifications; (3) development of tools for analysis and design; (4) development of building products; (5) formulation of building policy; and (6) development of managerial procedures. Finally the features of an efficient research organization are reviewed, the most important of which are careful work planning, high quality of work, conformance to time, and budget constraints and good communication with sponsors.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: specification, budget constraint, efficiency
Subjects: contractual condition, financial and cost management, performance management
Topics: Contract Administration, Quality Management, Cost Management
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here