Effective construction site management: A review

Bresnen, M J; Bryman, A E; Ford, J R; Keil, E T; Beardsworth, A D and Jepson, M A (1984) Effective construction site management: A review. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 110(4), pp. 420-436. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The contribution of site management to the achievement of construction performance objectives is examined. Drawing upon existing empirical data and linking them with research findings in the social sciences, the writers argue that there is often insufficient attention paid towards the range of complex and interdependent variables that can influence construction site activity. As a consequence, the predictive capacity of such research is limited, and the recommendations often derived, particularly concerning appropriate managerial actions, often fail to account for significant variability in circumstances. The applicability of the concept of “leadership” to the construction site situation, and its relationship with key component variables are singled out for attention.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: drawing, construction site, construction performance, social science, site management, variability
Subjects: theoretical framing, statistical analysis, construction operations, performance assessment, technical documentation, work location
Topics: Site Management, Design Practice, Research Practice
Descriptive scope: 4 PCTA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here