Gates, M and Scarpa, A (1984) Optimum penetration of friction piles. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 110(4), pp. 491-510. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
How deep and how hard should a friction pile be driven to achieve the minimum unit cost of bearing capacity? The tradeoffs are modeled in terms of optimum depth of penetration limited by: (1) Available order length; and (2) allowable blow count on the last foot of penetration. Usually, it will prove cost effective to drive the longest pile available as deep and as hard as possible no matter how much time is required, as long as the pile is not damaged. There exists a narrow range of conditions where this approach is contraindicated. A suitable formula for finding the optimum depth of penetration within the range is derived. The increase in blow count with increased penetration is developed as gradient r*. As a dimensionless factor, this parameter is a relative measure of the resistance of soil to penetration. Among other uses it is a measure of work. This factor can also be expressed in blows per foot (meter) per foot (meter). In this context, it is used with the formula for finding the optimum depth of penetration.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | penetration, unit cost, tradeoff |
| Subjects: | decision analysis, market analysis, financial and cost management |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Research Practice, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 1 C |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here