Ibbs, C W and Terveer, K R (1984) Integrated construction preventive maintenance system. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 110(1), pp. 43-59. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The maintenance of heavy construction equipment is a vital function for many construction contractors. A regular, structured preventive maintenance program can be a worthwhile investment for several reasons: Reduced field breakdowns; more efficient equipment and operator utilization; elimination of unnecessary parts damage and reductions in inventory requirements; preservation of warranties; more productive mechanics; and longer-lasting repairs. This article discusses an integrated preventive maintenance system developed for a large, multi-site quarrying operation. The physical and personnel requirements are briefly presented, and the management control aspects discussed in detail. Implementation considerations are related and the substantial improvements achieved in overall fleet availability are documented. Finally, the integration of this system to the company's other accounting modules is outlined.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | inventory, module, warranty, heavy construction, implementation, personnel, quarrying, preventive maintenance, integration, program, repair, accounting, construction contractor |
| Subjects: | infrastructure and transport systems, organizational analysis, geotechnical engineering, inventory management, architectural elements, management, performance measurement, maintenance engineering, software systems, contractual arrangements, economic analysis, practitioner |
| Topics: | Supply Chain Management, Quality Management, Human Resources, Digital Applications, Design Practice, Organizational Design, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Procurement, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here