Warszawski, A; Avraham, M and Carmel, D (1984) Utilization of precast concrete elements in building. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 110(4), pp. 476-485. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Precast concrete components can be used in building construction within a comprehensive “closed” system, or as separate elements in conjunction with any building method. The feasibility of this second possibility was examined within the framework of a conventional building system and the following alternatives of elements utilization: prestressed modular floor slabs, exterior walls, and a combination of slabs and exterior walls. Each of these alternatives was compared to the conventional system without precast elements. The following criteria were used as a basis for the comparison: the labor requirement, the direct building cost (labor and materials), the construction time, and other considerations of more subjective nature. The findings of the study indicated that the utilization of precast elements might considerably reduce the labor requirement on site, and the project construction time. The direct building costs were almost unaffected by the alternative solutions.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | building construction, construction time, labour requirement, precast concrete, building system |
| Subjects: | management, project controls, building construction, engineering systems, building materials |
| Topics: | Construction Technology, Construction Materials, Engineering Principles, Site Management, Time Control |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here