Valence of and satisfaction with job outcomes

Maloney, W F and McFillen, J M (1985) Valence of and satisfaction with job outcomes. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 111(1), pp. 53-73. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Approximately 2,800 unionized construction workers were surveyed and responses were received from 703, representing all crafts except boilermakers. The workers were asked about the importance they attach to various job related factors and their satisfaction with each factor. The 28 individual factors were reduced to seven using a factor analysis technique. The most important set of factors were those relating to the intrinsic nature of the work: working like a craftsman, performing challenging work, etc. The set of factors with which the workers was most satisfied was that of performance level: high productivity; quantity; and doing your work in a craftsmanlike manner. Individual factors that require attention on the part of contractors to improve worker motivation and satisfaction were identified using a 2 ´ 2 matrix that allowed the combination of importance and satisfaction scores. Overall satisfaction with the job was measured and a multiple regression analysis revealed that satisfaction with intrinsic factors makes the greatest contribution to general job satisfaction.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: construction worker, factor analysis, productivity, job satisfaction, satisfaction, multiple regression analysis, boilermaker, motivation
Subjects: management, statistical analysis, practitioner, project delivery, psychology
Topics: Research Practice, Project Management, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Human Resources
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here