Impacts of constructability improvement

O’Connor, J T (1985) Impacts of constructability improvement. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 111(4), pp. 404-410. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

An analysis of the construction resource utilization tradeoffs, which occur from constructability improvements, provides insight into the constructability improvement process. Matrices of construction and engineering impacts likely to result from constructability improvements are presented. Constructability improvements collected on a large industrial construction project are analyzed for their impact to the job. Frequencies of occurrence of both desirable and undesirable impacts are noted, as are the cost-significances of the various impact types. Constructability strategies and methods for achieving the most cost-beneficial impacts are presented. Numerous findings are presented, such as the following: (1) The likelihood of delays may be decreased most effectively by increasing engineering information availability and understandability; (2) the amount of required construction manpower may be most effectively decreased by simplifying the design, combining design elements, and seeking optimal design-originated construction techniques such as optimal construction systems, modularization, and improved design details. Of course, additional engineering effort may be required; and (3) construction activity durations may also be most effectively decreased by seeking optimal design-originated construction techniques.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: construction activity, constructability, duration, construction system, tradeoff, modularization, resource utilization, industrial construction, strategy
Subjects: management, construction operations, construction integration, building construction, decision analysis, site logistics, project controls
Topics: Business Strategy, Time Control, Site Management, Construction Technology, Engineering Principles, Risk Management, Design Practice
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here