Arditi, D and Albulak, M Z (1986) Line-of-balance scheduling in pavement construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 112(3), pp. 411-424. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Linear Scheduling Methods are best suited to projects that display repetitive characteristics, but their use in the construction industry is limited. Line-of-Balance (LOB) is a Linear Scheduling Method that also makes use of network technology. Its benefits and shortcomings are investigated in a highway surface treatment project where LOB has been used experimentally. It was determined that LOB is extremely sensitive to errors in man hour, crew size, and activity duration estimates. There are also problems of a visual nature with the presentation of the diagram. On the other hand, LOB allows a better grasp of the project than any other scheduling technique because it is possible to adjust activities' rates of production. It provides a smooth and efficient flow of resources and requires less time and effort to produce than network schedules. Research to make Linear Scheduling Methods more attractive is recommended.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | pavement construction, estimate, construction industry, duration, scheduling, linear scheduling |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, project controls, infrastructure engineering, financial and cost management, operations research |
| Topics: | Time Control, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here