Herbsman, Z (1986) SERC: A model for estimating construction inputs. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 112(3), pp. 425-439. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
One of the main problems in the process of design and management of construction projects is obtaining accurate information for preliminary estimates. This information is crucial for the development of integrated systems for construction management because of the relationship between construction input data and subjects such as estimating, cost control, scheduling, resource management, etc. Existing methods for estimating input that originated in industrial engineering are inadequate for the unique conditions of the construction industry. The model described in this paper applies statistical analysis of data from past projects, and enables the user to estimate the data needed for the construction of a new project. The model is based on the following components: Project items and their quantities; inputs needed to produce those items; and factors that affect inputs of a specific project. The model equation was calculated using multiple regression techniques. The paper concludes with a case study of a construction input configuration for a concrete structure.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | multiple-regression, statistical analysis, construction industry, concrete structure, case study, scheduling, estimating, configuration, construction project, estimate, integrated system, cost control, resource management |
| Subjects: | systems engineering, financial and cost management, production management, industry analysis, operations research, design methods, statistical analysis, structural engineering, data science, data collection methods, control systems |
| Topics: | Time Control, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Design Practice, Project Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here