Jaafari, A and Mateffy, V K (1986) Games people play with cost control in Australia. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 112(4), pp. 566-581. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
A study of a selected group of building and engineering construction contractors in the Australian construction industry was performed in order to determine the actual site cost control procedures and techniques being practiced. The study was conducted through a detailed questionnaire completed by the researcher during the course of interview sessions with the site managers of the 18 construction projects in the sample. The main trends disclosed from the questionnaire allowed a model of actual site cost control procedures to be flowcharted. This system was then subjected to a comparative analysis with an idealized site cost control system developed in a previous study. Cost control functions that are discussed in this paper include, among others, the method of work breakdown for site use in cost control, performance data feedback techniques and uses, yardsticks for cost control, and management action at the site. The study concludes with a set of general recommendations aimed to bring current site cost control practices more in line with the available body of knowledge.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | Australia, site manager, construction industry, interview, comparative analysis, questionnaire, cost control, construction project, body of knowledge, construction contractor |
| Subjects: | Geography, production management, industry analysis, data collection methods, practitioner, financial and cost management, knowledge management, data analysis and analytics |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Project Management, Geographical Context, Research Practice, Information Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 5 PCTEA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here