Sommerville, J and Campbell, C (2001) Project management: An evaluation of the client and provider attribute paradigms. In: Akintoye, A (ed.) Proceedings of 17th Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2001, Salford, UK.
Abstract
Within the realms of Project Management, debate continues as to the desired attributes of the Project Manager. There can be little doubt that effective Project Managers are required to be competent. This leads to the search for clarity as to what competence the Project Manager needs to display in any given situation i.e. what role must be undertaken at any point in time. Clients when seeking to engage a Project Manager have a schematic role paradigm within which they expect the Project Manager to operate. This role paradigm if met, establishes the Project Manager as competent in their eyes. Whether this maps directly onto the providers' role paradigm and the actual attributes of the Project Manager is the nub of the question. Over 7,000 individuals and organizations were targeted through a postal questionnaire that sought their responses to a range of questions relating to the expected attributes. Qualitative and quantitative evaluations of the returned questionnaires were undertaken to establish the clients' attribute preferences against those delivered by providers of the service. The findings present a plot model showing the Provider Attribute Profile and the User Attribute Profile. These indicate areas where the perception of the requirement for that attribute varied between the groups. Underlying reasons for this divergence are considered and discussed.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | project management; competence; roles and attributes |
| Index terms: | project manager, maps, preference, project management, paradigm, competence, questionnaire |
| Subjects: | profession, data collection methods, personnel development, project management theory and practice, education and knowledge transfer, spatial and geospatial analysis, decision-making and reasoning |
| Topics: | Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Human Resources |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here