Simulation of tunneling operations

Touran, A and Asai, T (1987) Simulation of tunneling operations. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 113(4), pp. 554-568. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The objective of this paper is to predict the tunnel advance rate in the construction of a several-mile-long, small-diameter (3–3.5 m) tunnel in soft rock. For this purpose, the CYCLONE simulation system is used. Several simulation models are developed to investigate the effect of different variables on the tunnel advance rate. At first the suitable tunneling method, including the tunnel support and material handling system, is selected by reviewing similar projects completed in recent years. Various cycle times and durations, e.g., TBM penetration rate and train travel time, are carefully calculated, based on previous tunneling jobs. After specifying the construction method and duration times, the developed simulation models are described. The impact of each major variable on the tunnel advance rate is studied by sensitivity analysis. These variables include the TBM penetration rate, the train travel time, the number of muck trains, the type of rock, and the rock standup time. Simulation models quantify the effect of each of these variables on the tunnel advance rate.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: duration, cyclone, construction method, sensitivity analysis, material handling, tunnel, penetration
Subjects: project controls, infrastructure and transport systems, building construction, product delivery, market analysis, climate science, environmental hazards
Topics: Research Practice, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Supply Chain Management, Site Management, Time Control
Descriptive scope: 2 PC

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here