Chang, L M; Hancher, D E; Napier, T R and Kapolnek, R G (1988) Methods to identify and assess new building technology. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 114(3), pp. 408-425. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The lack of a coordinated industry-wide effort to provide the emerging construction technological information is one of the reasons behind the slow adoption of new technologies in the U.S. construction industry. This paper reports the results of a research project on this critical issue. The purpose of the research was to develop a formalized mechanism to identify new building technologies available for use by the construction industry and to assess the potential impact of the identified new technologies on the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers construction program. There are many means to identify new building technologies. Information can be obtained through periodical search, code organizations, testing laboratories, the U.S. Patent and Trademark Department, advertising in trade magazines, and interviewing experts. The impact of each identified technology on the corps' construction programs was assessed in terms of the corps' five-year plans, the Means and Dodge manuals, and building systems affected by the technology. Other assessed features were a cost benefit comparison and the risk associated to implement the technology. The findings of this research are encouraging. A generic framework has been developed, and the areas that need to be further improved have been pointed out.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | laboratory, building technology, program, advertising, engineer, critical issue, new technology, construction industry, testing, periodical, building system |
| Subjects: | engineering systems, risk assessment, profession, research dissemination and communication, business, innovation and technology management, professional practice, software systems, industry analysis, research management |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Engineering Principles, Information Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Risk Management, Roles and Professions |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here