Easa, S M (1988) Earthwork allocations with linear unit costs. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 114(4), pp. 641-655. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
This paper presents a quadratic programming model of earthwork allocations that accommodates linear unit cost functions of purchase and excavation for borrow pits. The unit costs of haul and compaction for borrow pits and the various unit costs for earthwork from cut to fill sections and disposal sites are assumed to be constant (based on an earlier investigation). The solution of the model is explored and it is found that the global minimum cost is guaranteed only when the linear unit cost functions are nondecreasing. Extension of the model to accommodate setup costs for borrow pits and landfills is made and an efficient solution method is devised. This model, which complements existing optimization models of earthwork allocations, provides several capabilities over the commonly used mass-haul diagram. Application of the model to a numerical example is presented.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | unit cost, excavation, investigation, landfill, programming, earthwork |
| Subjects: | construction methods, programming, construction operations, data collection methods, financial and cost management, waste management |
| Topics: | Cost Management, Site Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Sustainability, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here