Ioannou, P G (1988) Bidding models: symmetry and state of information. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 114(2), pp. 214-232. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Several competitive bidding models since the late 1960s have been founded, criticized, and even rejected, based on incorrectly stated arguments concerning the apparent symmetry of the competitive positions of the prospective bidders. The proliferation of these arguments has led to confusion about the validity of the proposed models. This paper: (1) Illustrates the correct use of symmetry in competitive bidding as a function of available information and control; (2) explains the differences among nonsymmetric states of information that lead to apparent symmetry in the case of only two competitors; (3) presents and explains the assumptions that lead to Friedman’s general bidding model; (4) proves the probabilistic validity of Friedman’s model by using correctly stated arguments of symmetry; and (5) provides the foundations for understanding the limitations of other models.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | bidding, competitive bidding, validity, bidder, foundations |
| Subjects: | evaluation and assessment methods, structural engineering, bidding |
| Topics: | Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 CA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here