Ioannou, P G (1988) Pilot tunnels: Contractor's position. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 114(4), pp. 594-613. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Geologic uncertainty in underground construction promotes design and construction conservatism and has a significant impact on project cost. Site investigation can reduce this uncertainty and decrease the contingency amounts included in bids. Pilot tunnels are one of the best geologic exploration methods, but they are also one of the most expensive. This paper presents the contractor’s view concerning the usefulness of constructing a pilot tunnel as part of the site investigation program and offers guidelines for evaluating its benefits. These benefits can be realized both prior to and during construction. They include furnishing information about the geology and its behavior, and facilitating design development and construction operations. Pilot tunnels are generally most useful in large projects with limited surface access, and where the geologic conditions are unfavorable. Depending on project conditions, the construction of a pilot tunnel can reduce bid contingencies up to 20% of the project cost.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | program, exploration, tunnel, project cost, site investigation, design and construction, design development, underground construction, construction operation |
| Subjects: | geotechnical engineering, infrastructure and transport systems, economics, software systems, design process, environmental resource management, contractual arrangements, construction operations |
| Topics: | Procurement, Sustainability, Engineering Principles, Cost Management, Site Management, Design Practice, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here