Rolling resistance of off-road vehicles

Karafiath, L L (1988) Rolling resistance of off-road vehicles. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 114(3), pp. 458-471. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The rolling resistance (RR) of vehicles operating off-road is, despite its significance, an uncertain factor in haul-time and productivity estimates. The rule-of-thumb formula used for estimating the RR consistently underestimates the RR of free-rolling (nondriven) tires. The RR of driven tires is shown to vary considerably with the applied torque; at high torque (in low gears) it may be several times greater than the RR of free-rolling tires. This increase of the RR may result in a decrease in productivity, or at worst, in the immobilization of off-road vehicles. The use of an analytical tire-soil interaction model is a rational method of estimating the RR of both free-rolling and driven tires and, by summation, the total RR of wheeled off-road vehicles. Performance data sets consisting of rimpull and RR values for various values of slip, obtained from this model, present a realistic simulation of the interaction between vehicle and soil. Their use in conjunction with rimpull-speed relations supplied by manufacturers improves haul-time calculations and allows the performance of unbiased comparative analyses of various candidate vehicles for a variety of routing and soil conditions.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: estimate, interaction, productivity, estimating, comparative analysis, manufacturer
Subjects: management, behavioral psychology, practitioner, data analysis and analytics, financial and cost management
Topics: Research Practice, Cost Management, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here