Loper, J H; Marquis, E L and Rhomberg, E J (1988) Precast prestressed long-span bridges. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 114(1), pp. 95-103. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Precast prestressed concrete can be a strong, durable, and aesthetically pleasing material for use in long-span bridges. If erected using the proper techniques and care, such bridges meet society’s demands very well. Specifically, prestressed concrete allows for stronger bridges at lower construction and maintenance costs. With this objective as motivation, prestressed concrete design and construction has rapidly spread through the United States. Of the construction techniques available, two methods dominate: segmental cantilever construction and cable-stayed construction. These two techniques are the primary focus herein. In addition to the construction technique, the erection method and section type must be considered in the design process. In the United States, I-sections, box sections, T-sections, hollow-core, and channel sections are commonly used for highway bridge design. Care must also be taken to insure that a prestressed concrete bridge is an economical one when compared to reinforced concrete and steel plate girder bridges. Ultimately, it is the job of the engineer to consider each facet of a design, so that, in addition to performing as intended, the structure is safe and economical.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | society, design process, design and construction, engineer, United States, girder, motivation, bridge design, reinforced concrete, maintenance cost, steel plate, concrete bridge |
| Subjects: | structural engineering, financial management, profession, communities and social development, psychology, Geography, contractual arrangements, design methods, infrastructure and transport systems, building materials, materials science |
| Topics: | Geographical Context, Human Resources, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Construction Materials, Design Practice, Stakeholder Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here