Martin, G L (1988) Training programs for engineering consulting firms. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 114(1), pp. 121-132. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Engineering consulting firms heavily use and support in-house training programs. The objectives of these training programs are (1) To supplement the graduate engineer’s educational training; (2) to keep the professional engineer current and knowledgeable in the emerging engineering and management techniques and methods; (3) to prepare the engineer for a professional career in the firm; and (4) to satisfy the firm’s personnel, technical, and organizational needs. The transition from professional development in the individual’s area of expertise to that of managing people (e.g. projects, departments, offices) is of particular importance and is discussed. However, the development of people-skills cannot be at the expense of the individual’s technical knowledge. This paper presents a discussion of the in-house training programs provided by CH2M HILL, INC. for both field and office engineering and management personnel. The approaches used to develop, assess, and implement these in-house training programs are discussed. Special attention is also given to the types of in-house training programs offered at the various stages of the engineer’s or the manager’s professional development.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | personnel, manager, program, career, professional development, engineer |
| Subjects: | profession, practitioner, software systems, management, professional development |
| Topics: | Roles and Professions, Information Management, Human Resources, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here