Causes of high costs of construction in Nigeria

Okpala, D C and Aniekwu, A N (1988) Causes of high costs of construction in Nigeria. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 114(2), pp. 233-244. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

This paper concerns an investigation into the causes of high costs of construction in Nigeria. A preliminary survey involving all the professionals in the construction industry identified delays and direct cost overruns of the project as the principal factors leading to the high cost of construction. A questionnaire was then designed incorporating factors causing delays and cost overruns. It was distributed to engineers, architects, quantity surveyors, contractors and others involved in construction. A method of analysis was formulated and carried out based on the profession of the respondents and on the role of the individual in the industry (i.e., client, consultant, and contractors) and on the nature of construction (civil works and building works). Results indicate that: (1) High costs can be minimized by minimizing lapses in the management of human and material resources; (2) despite some slight differences, the professionals generally agreed that shortage of materials, methods of financing and payments for completed works, and poor contract management are the three major reasons for high construction costs; and (3) price fluctuation was identified as the most important factor responsible for the escalation of project costs.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: Nigeria, construction cost, cost overrun, engineer, direct cost, quantity surveying, construction industry, investigation, architect, profession, project cost, overrun, survey, contract management, financing, questionnaire
Subjects: financial and cost management, economic analysis, data collection methods, profession, institututions, project controls, industry analysis, economics, Geography, contract management
Topics: Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Geographical Context, Roles and Professions, Time Control, Contract Administration
Descriptive scope: 5 PCTEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here