Tatum, C B and Funke, A T (1988) Partially automated grading: Construction process innovation. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 114(1), pp. 19-35. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
The innovativeness of the construction industry has been both defended and debated. Innovative solutions to construction challenges have occurred, however, despite many hurdles. The partial automation of earthmoving equipment using laser-guided controls, one such advancement, is the subject of this paper. This latest generation of a fragmented family of construction laser applications is a cost-saving, productivity-enhancing aid to earthwork operations. This paper contrasts the former methods for fine grading with the partially automated technology, describes the process of innovation for the advanced technology, compares this process with a model of innovation in the construction firm, and develops conclusions and practical applications based on this example of construction innovation.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | earthmoving, construction industry, automation, productivity, construction process, construction innovation, earthwork, construction firm |
| Subjects: | building construction, industry analysis, management, automation and robotics, construction methods, construction operations, organization |
| Topics: | Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Business Strategy, Site Management, Digital Applications |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCT |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here