Abu-Hijleh, S F and Ibbs, C W (1989) Schedule-based construction incentives. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 115(3), pp. 430-443. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Construction incentives can be useful devices to improve project performance. The use of schedule-based incentives is particularly attractive because it can result in substantial time and cost savings. Furthermore, the design and implementation of schedule-based incentives are relatively easy and inexpensive. They are especially applicable to projects for which timely completion is critical. Several different forms and combinations of schedule incentives are available, each having its own advantages. Schedule-based incentive targets vary from the simplistic, end-of-project types, to the more sophisticated intermediate milestones, with various combinations in between. Both bonus and bonus/penalty award schemes are used in a wide array of forms. Contractor participation in the development of schedule targets can enhance the chances for success of the incentive plan, yet such participation is not always sought by owners. Use of bonus-only schedule incentives is recommended whenever a perceived benefit from above average schedule performance exists. Bonus size should be substantial enough to capture the attention of the contractor’s upper management. Exclusive use of penalties is counterproductive.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | schedule performance, penalty, incentive plan, owner, project performance, implementation, cost saving |
| Subjects: | regulatory law, project controls, sociology, project management theory and practice, management, economics, contractual arrangements |
| Topics: | Legal Issues, Human Resources, Time Control, Cost Management, Project Management, Stakeholder Management, Procurement |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here