Carr, R I (1989) Cost-estimating principles. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 115(4), pp. 545-551. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Estimates of materials, time, and costs provide information to some construction decisions in a similar way that financial accounting information provides to others. Financial statements are required to comply with generally accepted accounting principles, described in accounting literature, to ensure information is accurate and useful to decisions. This paper suggests general estimating principles that similarly guide good estimating practice. An estimate must be an accurate reflection of reality. An estimate should show only the level of detail that is relevant to decisions. Completeness requires that it include all items yet add nothing extra. Documentation must be in a form that can be understood, checked, verified, and corrected. Attention must be given to the distinction between direct and indirect costs and between variable and fixed costs. Contingency covers possible or unforeseen occurrences, both the expected value of possible identified events and the expectation that events will occur that cannot be identified in advance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | financial accounting, level of detail, documentation, expected value, estimating, accounting, indirect cost, reflection, estimate |
| Subjects: | economic analysis, financial and cost management, technical documentation, professional development, statistical analysis, cost management |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Procurement, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Information Management, Research Practice |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here