de Valence, Gerard (2001) Construction deflators and measurement of output. In: Akintoye, A (ed.) Proceedings of 17th Annual ARCOM Conference, 5-7 September 2001, Salford, UK.
Abstract
Through the system of national accounts a wide range of macroeconomic data is available, such as output, national income and expenditure. From the national accounts indexes of output per person employed and output per hour worked are derived, giving the basic measures of labour productivity. There are a range of issues associated with the macroeconomic measurement of production, output and labour, capital and multifactor (MFP) productivity. This paper focuses on specific measurement problems found in the deflators used in estimating the value of construction output. The purpose of this paper is to review deflators in general and construction deflators in particular, and to identify the major problems found in adjusting current prices to constant prices using these deflators. The topics covered include deflation techniques, measurement of output quality and capital inputs, and the use of input price indexes. A range of alternative construction cost indexes and deflators identified in the UK and US literature are discussed, and the extent of similarities between all these indexes identified. The approach taken is to, firstly, discuss the general characteristics of deflators and the problems that are commonly recognized in their application, and secondly, to analyse the features of deflators in the context of measurement of the output of the construction industry.
| Item Type: | Conference Paper (Paper) |
|---|---|
| Uncontrolled Keywords: | price indexes; deflation; construction output |
| Index terms: | labour productivity, construction cost index, income, estimating, construction output, construction industry, productivity |
| Subjects: | financial and cost management, economic analysis, operations management, cost indicators, management, industry analysis |
| Topics: | Design Practice, Site Management, Business Strategy, Cost Management, Research Practice, Project Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here