Productivity database and job cost control using microcomputers

Rayburn, L M (1989) Productivity database and job cost control using microcomputers. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 115(4), pp. 585-601. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The business environment for small-to mid-sized contractors is highly competitive. Success is obtained by those contractors who consistently earn the 2— 3% net profit that the marketplace allows. To ensure success in today’s business climate, contractors must hire and keep good people, emphasize quality and client relations, maintain credit lines, insurance, and bonding requirements, and have computer systems that provide instant access to the information necessary to operate the business. This paper is a case study describing how one construction company successfully integrated microcomputers and commercially produced software packages to peform many business tasks. A project cost control system is developed using spreadsheet programs that are integrated with the contractor’s historical record of labor productivity information. Also described are scheduling, word processing, and accounting for the small contractor using microcomputers.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: scheduling, computer system, software package, profit, construction company, project cost, control system, program, cost control, accounting, case study, spreadsheet, database, productivity, labour productivity, insurance
Subjects: data management, economics, software systems, management, monitoring and control, operations research, economic analysis, financial and cost management, data science, organization, data collection methods, computing systems
Topics: Cost Management, Business Strategy, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Time Control, Site Management, Digital Applications
Descriptive scope: 4 PCEA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here