Al-Bahar, J F and Crandall, K C (1990) Systematic risk management approach for construction projects. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 116(3), pp. 533-546. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Risk is inherently present in all construction projects. Quite often, construction projects fail to achieve their time, quality, and budget goals. A risk model entitled construction risk management system (CRMS) is introduced to help contractors identify project risks and systematically to analyze and manage them. The CRMS model is a logical substitute for the traditional intuitive unsystematic approach currently used by most contractors. The influence diagramming technique and Monte Carlo simulation are used as tools to analyze and evaluate project risks. Alternative risk management strategies are suggested. Such strategies include: risk avoidance, risk transfer, risk retention, loss reduction, and risk prevention and insurance.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | Monte Carlo simulation, loss reduction, construction project, risk retention, prevention, risk management, insurance, strategy |
| Subjects: | risk assessment, modelling and simulation, management, financial risk, economic analysis, production management |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Research Practice, Business Strategy, Project Management, Cost Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCA |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here