Bernold, L E (1990) Testing bar-code technology in construction environment. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 116(4), pp. 643-655. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Construction management, like management in other industries, relies on data that can be processed into information. In the information age, many mature technologies provide management with a variety of options for accessing data quickly and reliably. Bar-code technology is one option receiving more and more attention in general from the construction industry. Since bar codes are now rarely used in construction, knowledge about their applicability in this industry is sparse and lacks any scientific background. In particular, the question of the survivability of bar-code labels in the construction environment has never been investigated. This paper presents testing methods for bar-code labels and adhesives that have been specifically developed for the conditions of construction sites. Results of laboratory and field experiments using the testing procedures will be evaluated as a basis for general recommendations. Also presented are data input concepts developed for a specific application. The encouraging results of the research effort suggest that bar-code technology is indeed ready for use in construction.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | construction site, experiment, laboratory, construction industry, testing, option |
| Subjects: | industry analysis, research management, decision analysis, professional practice, work location, data collection methods |
| Topics: | Risk Management, Engineering Principles, Research Practice, Site Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 4 PCTE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here