Farid, F (1990) Pricing construction contracts under Tax Reform Act of 1986. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 116(2), pp. 300-315. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Construction business failures increased from 0.20% in 1979 to 1.12% in 1984. To improve profitability, fair and reasonable markup (FaRM) was defined as the smallest markup satisfying required rate of return (RRR). The Tax Reform Act of 1986 (TRA’86) reduced income-tax rates. In return, TRA’86 removed many tax shelters and loopholes. Construction is most affected by restrictions placed on the completed-contract accounting method. Managers need new techniques to consider taxes explicitly. The before-tax-RRR method makes no provisions for income taxes in cash flows. Instead, it employs a before-tax RRR high enough to yield the desired after-tax RRR. The tax-adjusted-FaRM method directly adjusts FaRM estimated in a tax-free world. The FaRM pricing model enables contractors to make better decisions. Instead of using subjective markups that may overlook income taxes, they may bid lower on projects offering more favorable cash flows or lower risks. This results in lower costs to owners while satisfying contractors' RRRs. Conversely, contractors can maintain RRRs on less favorable projects by bidding higher prices.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | bidding, accounting, manager, business failure, cash flow, profitability, construction contract, income, pricing, owner |
| Subjects: | financial management, sociology, practitioner, contract type, bidding, economic analysis |
| Topics: | Stakeholder Management, Roles and Professions, Procurement, Cost Management, Business Strategy |
| Descriptive scope: | 2 PC |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here