Construction of difficult dry dock in yokohama, Japan

Kumamoto, T; Kameda, H; Hoshiya, M and Ishii, K (1990) Construction of difficult dry dock in yokohama, Japan. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 116(2), pp. 201-220. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

Almost all coastal construction works in Japan today are carried out under variable and severe site conditions and tight budgetary constraints. Construction works are so unstable that civil engineers often meet many difficulties: (1) Soil, water, and climate conditions are not covered by present engineering rules; (2) no appropriate engineering methods for solving them exist theoretically; and (3) project circumstances, despite their simplicity, differ from past empirical data or similar works. There are two components in solving these problems. The first is to strengthen basic engineering through an advanced construction technology. The second, which is the focus of this paper, is to scientifically integrate management technology, together with Japanese quality control or TQC (total quality control), into the construction process, e.g., utilization of statistical methods in execution planning, and participation of all organization members in quality control and QC circle activities. The interaction of both approaches in construction is illustrated in this paper through an actual project for a dry dock built without using cofferdams.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: civil engineer, cofferdam, quality control, advanced construction technology, interaction, Japan, construction process, statistical method, construction work
Subjects: Geography, building construction, profession, project delivery, statistical analysis, structural engineering, manufacturing engineering, operations management, behavioral psychology
Topics: Site Management, Engineering Principles, Geographical Context, Project Management, Research Practice, Quality Management, Roles and Professions
Descriptive scope: 3 PCA

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here