Sarisley, E F (1990) Construction methods and costs of stress-laminated timber bridges. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 116(3), pp. 432-447. ISSN 0733-9364
Abstract
Modern timber bridges are being considered by several states as a cost-effective alternative to steel and concrete bridges for municipal and rural use. Before full-scale adoption of stress-laminated timber bridges can occur, a U.S. bridge specification needs to be developed incorporating research findings from experimental structures that have recently been built in this country. Although much attention has been focused on defining structural behavior and modeling prestress forces, little has been written about construction methods, engineering development, and the transfer of construction technology. This paper presents the results of an analysis of the construction process for a prototype stress-laminated timber-deck bridge. The constructibility, material specifications, projected maintenance, and life-cycle costs are addressed and compared to conventional bridge construction. This case study in Connecticut documents that a relatively short project duration was achieved (three months), along with significant cost savings, despite the experimental nature of the study.
| Item Type: | Article |
|---|---|
| Index terms: | construction method, prototype, specification, bridge construction, timber bridge, documents, construction process, case study, concrete bridge, construction technology, cost saving, duration, modelling |
| Subjects: | professional development, infrastructure engineering, contractual condition, economics, infrastructure and transport systems, building construction, project controls, digital engineering, data collection methods, analytical methods, modelling and simulation |
| Topics: | Digital Applications, Site Management, Contract Administration, Time Control, Cost Management, Research Practice, Engineering Principles, Information Management |
| Descriptive scope: | 3 PCE |
N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here