Vendor analysis for best buy in construction

Bernold, L E and Treseler, J F (1991) Vendor analysis for best buy in construction. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 117(4), pp. 645-658. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

It has been generally recognized that the construction industry needs to improve its efforts in managing the construction material. Studies have shown that the lack or mishandling of construction material can cause loss in productivity, resulting in money wasted. Such unnecessary expenses could be drastically reduced if more emphasis were given on properly managing the consumable and nonconsumable material from the design stage to its final use in the building process. A crucial step in any construction project is the acquisition of the needed material, both bulk and engineered. The quality of the delivered material, the timeliness of the shipments, etc., can far outweigh the importance of the purchasing price. Poor quality may require extensive rework, while late shipments may delay activities on the critical path. Thus, the selection of the proper vendor is very important for the overall performance on the construction site. This paper presents a vendor analysis system that is based on the best-buy concept. It is demonstrated how the purchasing department’s perception of a best buy differs from the priorities of a construction manager. A detailed comparison highlights these differences.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: critical path, construction site, rework, Construction IT, building process, construction project, construction manager, design stage, purchasing, productivity, acquisition, construction industry, construction material
Subjects: production management, management, information systems, industry analysis, procurement strategy, building construction, business, profession, professional practice, work location, building materials, operations management, operations research
Topics: Digital Applications, Design Practice, Site Management, Time Control, Business Strategy, Engineering Principles, Project Management, Research Practice, Roles and Professions, Procurement
Descriptive scope: 3 PCT

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here