Construction scheduling: Principles, practices, and six case studies

Cole, L J R (1991) Construction scheduling: Principles, practices, and six case studies. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 117(4), pp. 579-588. ISSN 0733-9364

Abstract

The paper presents a review of the need for the planning and monitoring of construction work, a description of the characteristics of site construction work, particularly the degree of task repetition required for project execution, a review of two planning models comprising the critical path model, which is based on the concept that a project consists of a series of discrete activities, and the linear scheduling-flow line model, which is based on the concept that a project consists of a series of repetitive activities. The practices of contractors when confronted with a construction scheduling problem and the use of the techniques derived from the models are examined. Six successful case studies are included, including two renovation projects and four commercial office buildings, two based on the critical path method, two based on the flow line method, and two that use both models in appropriate sections. The paper concludes with the general observations that: Few contractors use planning techniques to their full potential; critical path methods are best suited to nonrepetitive projects; flow line is best suited to repetitive projects; and as most contracts have dual characteristics, no single system can meet all a contractor’s requirements for planning and monitoring construction work.

Item Type: Article
Index terms: planning technique, linear scheduling, critical path method, commercial office, critical path, monitoring, renovation, construction work, repetitive project, construction scheduling, case study
Subjects: urban planning, operations research, operations management, construction type, data collection methods, control systems, project controls, renovation and retrofit, production management
Topics: Time Control, Site Management, Construction Technology, Governance, Research Practice, Project Management, Engineering Principles
Descriptive scope: 3 PCE

N.B. Descriptive scope is a count of how many of the five facets of empirical research are indicated by the words used in title, abstract and keywords. It is not intended as a judgement on the research; merely a count of the kind of word we would expect to indicate Phenomenon, Concepts, Theoretical framing, Empirical techniques, Analytical techniques. If all five are present, then a code of “5 PCTEA” will indicate this. If you feel the coding for this record is questionable, we welcome discussion around the terms we matched or the way we categorized them. The facet you would expect may not be coded, or a facet may be coded inappropriately. This can also bear on a larger question, of which facets should be treated as defining in construction management research. Please get in touch, and we will look at it. More details here